Skip to main content

We बेईमान Indians


                                  We बेईमान Indians
Since the demonetization announced on 8th of November, 2016 by Prime Minister Modi; I have been hearing lot of stories; some of them are absolutely true and painful. Prominent among these are the loss of jobs in small scale industries which has affected laborers. The excuse given by owners of such kind of industries is that they don’t have cash to pay them. Now it sounds Absurd; why cash only? Yes, you are hearing it right. It has been ‘Tradition” in Indian “system” to do transaction in cash only. CHO CHWEET of them. 

Now comes the trivia; Do you know 74 % of our economy is in cash? Yes, this is true. Now lacuna behind isn’t difficult to understand. Some of us sometimes argue that if major part of our economy is in cash then why so India is among the fastest growing economies in the world Because Cash transactions are the major source of Indirect taxes which act as buffer for the losses in collection of direct taxes. 

Now comes the moot point Why 96 % of us Indians are
बेईमान ; But I sometimes put this figure to 99 % because according to Govt data, Only 1 % of Indians PAY Income Tax, rest 3-4 % only file income tax returns with zero income or no profit . This is the Income Tax part which forces us to become बेईमान. We don’t want to share the cash with banks which is estimated at around 14 lakh crore. Why do 99 % of us always rue about our “expectations” from the government. Hypocrites of us? 

Actually when Prime Minister announced the demonetization on 8th of Nov;  I thought only 30-40 %  of cash would be deposited in banks . Now when the figure is touching 14 lakh crores ; I usually laugh it out , Most people are so attached to their Black Money as if it was also their
हक-हलाल की कमाई.

I would urge my fellow Indians Not to behave like hypocritical “honest”; This exercise started at 12’o clock of 8th November’s night has exposed you all .                

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURD THEME OF WAQT (1965), A DELIBERATE PLOY?

In the 1965 film Waqt, the choice of an earthquake as the catalyst for family separation is often cited as "absurd" or "flimsy" because it serves as a sanitized metaphor for the Partition of India. Critics and film scholars highlighted the following reasons for this perceived absurdity in the past as well Avoidance of Political Sensitivity: At the time of its 1965 release, India was in the midst of war with Pakistan. Filmmakers used the earthquake to evoke the mass displacement and trauma of 1947 without directly addressing the politically charged and communal violence of Partition. Dubious reason of Long-Term Separation: Critics argue that while an earthquake causes immediate chaos, it rarely results in family members being scattered to completely different cities (Bombay, Delhi) and remaining lost to each other for decades in a way that Partition-era migration did. Thematic Focus on Fate: The earthquake aligns with the movie’s title (Waqt meaning "Tim...

Left Liberal is an oxymoron

In today's politically polarized landscape, the term "left liberal" often finds itself in the midst of heated debates. Critics argue that being a left-leaning liberal is paradoxical due to the inherent conflict between leftist ideologies, capitalist systems, and associations with Islamists. Here I would like to explore whether the label of "left liberal" is indeed contradictory in nature. How they think-- When we identify someone as a leftist, we usually understand them to advocate for social equality, justice, and a more egalitarian society. Historically, leftists aim to dismantle oppressive systems, promote workers' rights, and bring about progressive social change. Now argument is that this ideology inherently clashes with the concept of liberalism, which upholds individual freedom and limited government intervention. However we sometimes equate these people with communist ideology with a heavy dose of socialism. But it is just 180 degree opposite. ...

Wokeism, Indian and global perspective

To be completely honest, until I started using Twitter, I had never heard of WOKEISM or WOKE people when I first started using social media, which was about 14 years ago. Twitter in fact provided me with a window into what the rest of the world believes. I was unable to find the definition of "Wokeism" in either my preferred Webster's or Chamber's dictionaries. To my surprise, I found it in online on dictionary.com/. Wokeism or Woke Culture is defined as the "promotion of liberal progressive ideology and policy as an expression of sensitivity to systemic injustices and prejudices," according to the statement. Some says, it’s origins rooted in African American Vernacular English. It is actually a Left-Liberal(sic) phenomenon . I first began looking for examples of how Woke people behave in other parts of the world, particularly in Europe or North America. Over there, Wokeism is a term derived from the word “woke,” which initially meant being aware of social...