Skip to main content

Left Liberal is an oxymoron


In today's politically polarized landscape, the term "left liberal" often finds itself in the midst of heated debates. Critics argue that being a left-leaning liberal is paradoxical due to the inherent conflict between leftist ideologies, capitalist systems, and associations with Islamists. Here I would like to explore whether the label of "left liberal" is indeed contradictory in nature.
How they think--
When we identify someone as a leftist, we usually understand them to advocate for social equality, justice, and a more egalitarian society. Historically, leftists aim to dismantle oppressive systems, promote workers' rights, and bring about progressive social change. Now argument is that this ideology inherently clashes with the concept of liberalism, which upholds individual freedom and limited government intervention.
However we sometimes equate these people with communist ideology with a heavy dose of socialism. But it is just 180 degree opposite. These frauds typically have upper middle class ancestory who would discuss wealth disparities in the country while sipping their preferred single malt. The funny thing is that a typical middle-class person can be easily swayed by what they say in both traditional media and social media. By the way, since both terms are in opposition to one another, how can a leftist have liberal values?
If you try to argue with them about a particular issue, they will initially regard you as an idiot. They will come to "Whataboutary" if you persist and they begin to take you seriously but lack any opposing points of view. They might also call you BHAKT because it is popular right now.
It is well known that the left-liberal movement frequently expresses worry about these groups' ties to or sympathies for Islamists. Or, you can refer to them as Strange Bed Fellows. The question of why Left-Liberals would work with Islamists, whose ideologies frequently support conservative values and religious fundamentalism, is the first that sometimes forces us to ask. According to one theory, even though Islamism does not support social or gender equality or human rights, left liberals aim to challenge oppressive power structures and oppose the perceived dominance of Western nations by doing this. I also concur with this theory. These hypocrites simply support them because it advances their larger objectives. In order to accomplish this, they will attempt to promote their own made-up theory regarding a nonviolent religion like SANATAN DHARMA. HINDUTVA is now a derogatory term for them, and you can find countless articles attacking this religion in both Indian and foreign media.
They believe that supporting marginalized groups, including Muslims, is not contradictory to their ideals but rather an essential component of fighting for social justice and equality. As a result, you WILL NOT find them vigorously denouncing Islamism on various platforms.
In my views, these hypocrites are to be exposed on regular basis who are confusing gullible people on daily basis. Hilariously, these woke people would often seen abusing capitalists on latest version of i-phone while sipping their choicest Single Malt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURD THEME OF WAQT (1965), A DELIBERATE PLOY?

In the 1965 film Waqt, the choice of an earthquake as the catalyst for family separation is often cited as "absurd" or "flimsy" because it serves as a sanitized metaphor for the Partition of India. Critics and film scholars highlighted the following reasons for this perceived absurdity in the past as well Avoidance of Political Sensitivity: At the time of its 1965 release, India was in the midst of war with Pakistan. Filmmakers used the earthquake to evoke the mass displacement and trauma of 1947 without directly addressing the politically charged and communal violence of Partition. Dubious reason of Long-Term Separation: Critics argue that while an earthquake causes immediate chaos, it rarely results in family members being scattered to completely different cities (Bombay, Delhi) and remaining lost to each other for decades in a way that Partition-era migration did. Thematic Focus on Fate: The earthquake aligns with the movie’s title (Waqt meaning "Tim...

Wokeism, Indian and global perspective

To be completely honest, until I started using Twitter, I had never heard of WOKEISM or WOKE people when I first started using social media, which was about 14 years ago. Twitter in fact provided me with a window into what the rest of the world believes. I was unable to find the definition of "Wokeism" in either my preferred Webster's or Chamber's dictionaries. To my surprise, I found it in online on dictionary.com/. Wokeism or Woke Culture is defined as the "promotion of liberal progressive ideology and policy as an expression of sensitivity to systemic injustices and prejudices," according to the statement. Some says, it’s origins rooted in African American Vernacular English. It is actually a Left-Liberal(sic) phenomenon . I first began looking for examples of how Woke people behave in other parts of the world, particularly in Europe or North America. Over there, Wokeism is a term derived from the word “woke,” which initially meant being aware of social...