Skip to main content

Agricultural Middlemen in Punjab Hold the Actual ‘Keys’ ?

The ongoing farmers’ protests at the border of Delhi is being projected by major portion of main stream media as a kind of pan India farmers’ protest. I have strong objections to this deliberate ignorance by a large section of media. First of all,national media didn’t pick up the issues and reasons behind the protests which were already going on in Punjab since the ordinances were issued earlier by the central govt. These smaller protests became bigger when farmers started blocking railway lines. Even then the national media didn’t take notice of a larger questions... 
“Why were only Punjab farmers protesting?”
 Why did Rahul Gandhi visit only Punjab twice on farmers issues?
What were there in those 3 farm acts which have affected the farmers of Punjab to large extent?
It’s an open secret how these protests were instigated by leftist farmers’ union members, every political leader and various singers/lyricists who composed and wrote various songs invoking religion and even called for armed struggle in their songs as well.
I am amazed how mainstream media has been ignoring the role of middlemen known as
आढ़ती in Punjab and Haryana. I don’t have proof of their involvement in the current agitation but their role in the lives of around 80% of total farmers’ population in Punjab must have been studied. The importance of these middlemen can be judged from the fact that these chaps were defended by the current Punjab CM during these ongoing protests. Many so called Agriculture EXPERTS, specially based in Punjab have always selectively ignored their role whenever an agrarian crisis in Punjab is discussed; because their every other arguments otherwise would become irrelevant.

Do you know that Capt Amrinder Singh was honoured as "Fakhr-e-Quom” (Pride of the community) in 2017 by the same आढ़ती (middlemen) association?
Now I will discuss in detail and take up every aspect of these middlemen based at Punjab; their affect on the lives of farmers. Only after reading it, you can come to a logical conclusion.

Facets which can’t be ignored
:

There are around 40,000 registered Middlemen/Commission Agents/आढ़ती in Punjab whose substantial income comes from govt in the form of commission which is incurred from the sale of farmers’ produce. These people collectively earn around 1600 crores only from the commission. Actual income of these commission agents comes from the interest on the loans provided to small and middle farmers at the interest rate starting from 1.5% to 2% per month. Many political chaps park their money with these people. These Commission Agents/ आढ़ती keep pleasing those people whosoever are in power; by becoming "benevolent", may it be contributing Gurudwaras in the state or political outfits. Many of these people MANAGE the agricultural land of NRIs and keep large chunk of money in return. We can say these people control the rural economy.
The current mandi system under APMC act preferably in the favour of these ‘aadhtiyas’ because it provide them a scope of assured annual income from the sure shot lifting of farmers' produce by govt.
Now come to the farm acts which mainly allow any farmer to sell his produce to any person outside this mandi system means a dent on the decades old assured income scheme. Even the ‘contract farming’ if any farmer indulges in, also means assured commission on the said produce is also gone. The businessman who does contract farming arrangement with a farmer would also advance them credit, provide them with seeds, monitor them, etc. Thus, their secondary incomes of आढ़ती
are also all jeopardised.
एक मासूम सा प्रश्न: When there is so much at stake of these people; do you think these people are watching everything from the sidelines?
Do you think, Akalis left NDA because of farmers? No. Those who coauthored the Bill with BJP, all of a sudden realised they can’t afford to ruffle Arhtiyas in election year; hence they stepped out of NDA, to secure them. Just Imagine, If anybody’s assured income source is going to be compromised; to what extent he can go? If rumours are to be believed ; if each member of these 40000 'adhtiyas' contribute 1 lakh towards the ‘agitation’, it comes out to be Rs.400 crores apart from the contributions by so called NRIs.
You ask any ‘farmer’ in Punjab about their reservations against the acts; he will say only one parroted line “Repeal the laws. That’s it; no reasons”. No explanation as to why?
The most logical question to these farmers would be, how these laws would affect their lives which they are ENJOYING it now? Oh yes, Farmers may lead their lives as before but with the advent of these farm laws,middlemen are seeing what a farmer with 3-4 acres of land couldn't.

 That is why I would like to call it as
ARHTIYA’s PROTESTS than the Farmers’ Protests. Farmers are there at the protest sites, only to give it some sort of legitimacy


Comments

Syncshout said…
This has to be published on larger forums for other people to understand the insights of the protest. Though i know the logics involving around arthiyas livelihood but they are not only the key but one of the key. Interesting read!
Hard Talk said…
As far as I studied this agitation ;It started on rumour mongering which instigated the farmers to block railway lines at the first place. Subsequently political parties jumped into the bandwagon;somehow communists spearheaded it because they have EXPERTISE of strikes. Now this PUNJAB FARMERS protest is a cocktail of every political party of Punjab sans BJP. They see it as a golden chance to PROVE Modi as anti-farmers

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURD THEME OF WAQT (1965), A DELIBERATE PLOY?

In the 1965 film Waqt, the choice of an earthquake as the catalyst for family separation is often cited as "absurd" or "flimsy" because it serves as a sanitized metaphor for the Partition of India. Critics and film scholars highlighted the following reasons for this perceived absurdity in the past as well Avoidance of Political Sensitivity: At the time of its 1965 release, India was in the midst of war with Pakistan. Filmmakers used the earthquake to evoke the mass displacement and trauma of 1947 without directly addressing the politically charged and communal violence of Partition. Dubious reason of Long-Term Separation: Critics argue that while an earthquake causes immediate chaos, it rarely results in family members being scattered to completely different cities (Bombay, Delhi) and remaining lost to each other for decades in a way that Partition-era migration did. Thematic Focus on Fate: The earthquake aligns with the movie’s title (Waqt meaning "Tim...

Left Liberal is an oxymoron

In today's politically polarized landscape, the term "left liberal" often finds itself in the midst of heated debates. Critics argue that being a left-leaning liberal is paradoxical due to the inherent conflict between leftist ideologies, capitalist systems, and associations with Islamists. Here I would like to explore whether the label of "left liberal" is indeed contradictory in nature. How they think-- When we identify someone as a leftist, we usually understand them to advocate for social equality, justice, and a more egalitarian society. Historically, leftists aim to dismantle oppressive systems, promote workers' rights, and bring about progressive social change. Now argument is that this ideology inherently clashes with the concept of liberalism, which upholds individual freedom and limited government intervention. However we sometimes equate these people with communist ideology with a heavy dose of socialism. But it is just 180 degree opposite. ...

Wokeism, Indian and global perspective

To be completely honest, until I started using Twitter, I had never heard of WOKEISM or WOKE people when I first started using social media, which was about 14 years ago. Twitter in fact provided me with a window into what the rest of the world believes. I was unable to find the definition of "Wokeism" in either my preferred Webster's or Chamber's dictionaries. To my surprise, I found it in online on dictionary.com/. Wokeism or Woke Culture is defined as the "promotion of liberal progressive ideology and policy as an expression of sensitivity to systemic injustices and prejudices," according to the statement. Some says, it’s origins rooted in African American Vernacular English. It is actually a Left-Liberal(sic) phenomenon . I first began looking for examples of how Woke people behave in other parts of the world, particularly in Europe or North America. Over there, Wokeism is a term derived from the word “woke,” which initially meant being aware of social...